Friday, January 11, 2008

Williams leads Jazz past short-handed Suns

Williams leads Jazz past short-handed Suns
Visit for the complete story.

Why ... trade deadline season doesn't have to be like this
The trade deadline is on February 21st. From here until then you're going to hear a litany of trade suggestions from TV talking heads (who usually don't name names in lieu of screaming that certain teams need "a big man who can score"), NBA scribes, beat writers on blogs, bloggers on blogs, and message board denizens. It's only natural, and there's nothing wrong with it. You'll hear plenty on this space as well.

And, if we could implore these suggest'ors to do one thing, it would be consider this:

In a two-team deal, there are two teams.

(Also, in a three-team deal, there are three teams. In a four-team deal, there are a lot of lawyers making a lot of overtime pay.)

Stuck at home and without an outlet to vent last summer, I spent the warmer months bashing my head against the wall upon hearing trade rumor after trade rumor that usually left us screaming (at the cat), "why in the hell would the Timberwolves want Lamar Odom/Shawn Marion and his contract? They're rebuilding!"

You see, a lot of these trade creators, and the people that follow up on the creation, love to get it really, really right for one team (usually residing in the town that this particular person works out of), while leaving other teams in the dust.

It can't work that way. Every newspaper is online. Every blog has been bookmarked. Shows can by Tivo'd, videos can be uploaded to YouTube, and radio chat shows can be transcribed or made available in mp3 format. Everyone should be held accountable, and every media member (whether you're getting paid, or not) should consider the flip side of the coin. We owe it to our readers, listeners, watchers, employers ... everyone.

Let's go over some examples.

Marc Narducci is a great beat writer, fine writer in general, and he's covered the 76ers for 23 years. On his blog, he relayed the suggestion of a 76ers blogger who wondered aloud if the Memphis Grizzlies might be up for trading Pau Gasol and Kyle Lowry to the Sixers for Sam Dalembert, Rodney Carney, and a first-round pick.

Now, let's go over particulars:

Pau Gasol, way the hell better than Sam Dalembert.

Kyle Lowry, way the hell better than Rodney Carney.

First round pick? Currently, the Sixers are looking at something in the low lottery range.

So, the Grizz would take on two players worse than the ones they have, add to their glut at the wing position, not grab any cap relief ... for the 11th pick in the Draft?

Not quite, says Narducci.

(Sweet. He's going to tear this one apart)

"The first round pick would have to be protected because if not, the Sixers might be giving up Michael Beasley or O.J. Mayo or Derrick Rose."


First off, it's not Narducci's suggestion, and it's only a blog post, and he does raise a little quibble ("And why would Memphis make the trade? The Grizzlies are allowing 104 points per game and could use Dalembert's defense. Yet if they got rid of Gasol, their offense would be worse than the Sixers."); but we really have to take the time to try and walk in the other team's shoes for a while. �

Now that everyone is held accountable, we can't fill space for the sake of filling space trying to put Tracy McGrady in a New York Knick uniform without thinking about the team that would be trading Tracy McGrady. I don't like picking on Narducci, nothing he said was really off, but this likely starts off a good five weeks worth of nonsense, and I'd like to nip it in the bud tout bloody suite.

On the flip side, Gary Woelful of the Racine Journal-Times is nipping buds all over the place:

"Let's squelch these two, almost laughable rumors about the Bucks right here and now:

1) They won't acquire Zach Randolph from the New York Knicks.

2) They won't acquire Ron Artest from the Sacramento Kings, either.

Those rumors have been circulating on the Internet the last couple of days and, while they make for lively talk show banter, they're simply unrealistic.

Take Randolph, for example. The guy has a history of off-court issues, not to mention $61 million still remaining on his contract. Do you think for one nano-second Bucks owner Herb Kohl would even contemplate taking on such a plump contract, much less for someone who has hardly been a choir boy?"

Forgetting the "choir boy" aspect, let's just look at someone like Randolph as an asset, and little else.

The Bucks have one expiring contract in Jake Voskuhl, and it's good for three million bucks. Randolph makes 13.3 million this season, and the Bucks have to come close to matching that salary. With Andrew Bogut and Yi Jianlian untouchable, the Knicks would have to take any combination of Mo Williams (another shoot-first point guard?), Bobby Simmons (making an average of 10 million a year until 2010), Dan Gadzuric (who I still think can play, but he's due to make about 6.5 a year until 2011), or Desmond Mason (who the Bucks probably won't trade).

Isiah Thomas, as nutty as he is, won't be making this trade. Doesn't matter how bad he is at his job, doesn't matter that Zach isn't a choir boy made for Milwaukee, and it doesn't matter if Zeke and Zach get into a row between now and February 21st. There are two teams, and the deal isn't happening for either side unless both sides agree to be really, really bad at their jobs.

So once, again, imploring:

Study the other teams you're involving in the boffo deal for the team you're most interested in. Understand what they're trying to do with their salary structure, who they're building around, who's in the rotation, look at the ages of the players, find out how much they're making, and consider that at least 2/3rds of the NBA fans listening or reading are either going to be objective observers of both teams, or a fan of the "other team."

And if things don't change, we've plenty of space to nip.

Pistons' balance keeps Duncan, Spurs at bay
Visit for the complete story.

Catching up with the Wizards, at our own peril

Football season is over in Washington (sorry, mate), so this means that the Washington Post's Dan Steinberg can devote more attention to the NBA's nuttiest team.

Yesterday, he went into great detail regarding a vets vs. youngsters scrimmage that ended Wizards practice, including some choice quotes (and pictures) of DeShawn "the Locksmith" Stevenson. Steinz also followed up on a visual comparison between Oleksiy Pecherov and a beloved television icon that was actually first pointed out by Chicago Bulls color commentator Stacey King a few months ago.

Then there's this. And I don't know what to think about it.�

The Locksmith has a GIANT flippin' "2" tattoo on his back, that's his number (thankfully), and it looks like it was formed by both dollar signs and snakeskin in equal parts, and drawn by M.C. Escher.

It also means that Stevenson can never play for Boston, Philadelphia (according to Wikipedia, "never officially retired, but taken out of circulation"), Chicago (Norm Van Lier put a curse on #2 because it was never retired, and it should be retired), Detroit, Milwaukee, or Sacramento; because I think giant back tattoos count as retired numbers in the NBA.

NBA grants Heat, Hawks first replay since 1982
The Atlanta Hawks and Miami Heat must replay the final 51.9 seconds of their game last month. This will be the first time since 1982 the league has sent teams back on the court for a replay.

YouTube of the day: watching the Pacers pack it in

No crappy submarine sandwiches in this one, just a breakdown of how the Indiana Pacers like to defend under new coach Jim O'Brien. There's no audio in this clip, so you might want to pull up this video at the same time (no, you're not about to be RickRoll'd, I promise).

I've been wondering all season how a team mostly made of poor individual defenders, the solid Danny Granger, and an aching Jermaine O'Neal could rank 13th in overall defensive efficiency, but I think we have an answer.

Not only do the Pacers like to run like the Suns, they also like to force teams into shooting over the top of them, rather than traipsing into the lane. It's also part of the reason why they allow teams to shoot 37.8 percent from behind the three-point arc, the third-worst mark in the NBA.

If that was a little too dull for you, then here's a clip of Reggie Miller getting his come-uppance.

(Video courtesy the Coaching Better Basketball blog).

Former Heat star Rice arrested on battery charges
Former Miami Heat star Glen Rice was arrested Friday on a felony battery charge after police say he beat a man he found hiding in his estranged wife's closet.

No comments: